Advertisement

Perfecting the Electrostatic Cleaning Process

Best practices for facilities turning to electrostatic sprayers for coronavirus cleaning solutions

electrostatic cleaner

When pandemics occur, organizations are under pressure to show that they are doing something different to protect patrons and employees. But different does not always mean better. For example, one Hong Kong airport is testing full-body disinfection booths at entrances. However, spraying disinfectant on hands and skin will do little to prevent the virus from entering the building and may cause health issues for those sprayed with disinfectant.

Electrostatic sprayers (ESS) are in high demand from some organizations that want to apply disinfectant to a large area at once. Companies such as Marriott International and Southwest Airlines are testing this equipment to clean quickly.

Common cleaning errors

However, the reality is that many people are not properly disinfecting when using an ESS or are creating additional health risks for staff. Consider the following potential errors and issues:

  • Not applying enough product. Users must apply disinfectant solution in a thick enough layer to keep the product wet for the duration of its contact time as stated on the product label. Making one fast pass with an electrostatic sprayer may not release enough liquid to meet the label contact time. For a two-square meter area, it may take 20-30 seconds of continuous back and forth spraying to apply enough product for a 5-minute contact time disinfectant under typical environmental conditions. This is not much different than the time it takes to manually wipe the surface.
  • Not wiping after the contact time is met. The mechanical action of wiping further adds to the overall efficacy of the process, physically removing organisms. Wiping also removes product before it builds up on the surface, which can make disinfecting more difficult and cause surface discoloration or damage over time. Even when ESS is used to spread the disinfectant, manual wiping should be part of the disinfection process.
  • Spraying too close to electrical equipment vents. Professionals need to be wary of spraying near electric equipment, as spray droplets can enter vents and potentially cause issues with electrical equipment.
  • Using the wrong chemicals. Not all disinfectants are appropriate for ESS use. An ESS may produce small droplets that can be inhaled deep into the lungs, possibly creating health and safety risks for the worker. Before using an ESS, a facility should conduct an exposure risk assessment to ensure the staff can use the system safely. Some chemicals, such as chlorine bleach, have the potential to create a significant risk when sprayed through an ESS.

An exposure risk assessment may dictate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for staff when using an ESS. This would involve PPE fit testing and oversight to ensure employees wear it properly. Given these points, BSCs and facility managers should be appropriately cautious when selecting new equipment.

Best practices for BSCs and facility managers

When choosing a disinfectant, there are numerous features to consider:

  • Check that the product is approved for the pathogens of concern. For COVID-19, the disinfectant must have Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-confirmed claims against the novel coronavirus.
  • Purchase a one-step disinfectant with a shorter contact time—preferably five minutes or less. Cleaning and disinfecting in one step will accomplish your goal without sacrificing performance and a short contact time helps ensure the product is used in compliance.
  • Look for a product range that offers solutions in wipe, concentrate, and ready-to-use formats to meet a variety of needs. Not all product forms are appropriate for all situations. Having flexibility in how the product is applied is important.
  • The best products are gentle on skin and surfaces while tough on pathogens. Look for products with accelerated hydrogen peroxide that offer high efficacy and low toxicity.

Once you’ve selected products, conduct training to avoid common cleaning and disinfecting mistakes. For example, skipping the pre-cleaning phase when there are soiled surfaces or ignoring the disinfectant contact time will impact efficacy. Mandate that employees follow the manufacturer’s instructions and keep surfaces wet for the full duration of the contact time.

Failing to wipe the surface is another common mistake. The cleaning process selected should include physical wiping of surfaces.

Consider supplying staff with microfiber or cotton cloths, or disposable wipes, as disinfectants can bind with certain materials. Be sure to train employees to follow proper cleaning procedures to avoid cross-contamination or equipment and surface damage.

If you choose to use electrostatic sprayers, select one tested for use with your disinfectant so you know it is safe for workers and will perform as expected. Also, look for equipment that produces reasonably sized droplets and consider whether an exposure risk assessment is needed. Train staff on disinfecting procedures, including applying the proper thickness of product and wiping surfaces to maintain efficacy.

Cleaning in a new world

Employees need to know how to properly clean and disinfect surfaces, especially during and after the pandemic. When in the market for disinfectants, building service contractors and facility managers should pick a product that is fast-acting, effective and less likely to cause irritation and surface damage.

Peter Teska

Infection Prevention Expert

Peter Teska is a global infection prevention application expert at Diversey, a leader in smart, sustainable solutions for cleaning and hygiene. He is a member of the Diversey Hygiene Academy and can be reached at peter.teska@diversey.com. For more information, visit www.diversey.com.

Topics Tags

Also in Infection Control

covid-19 cleaning
September 14, 2020 Kathleen Misovic

Back-to-School Cleaning in K-12 Facilities

August 6, 2020 Michael Wilson

How to Remove PPE Properly

July 16, 2020 Ada Baldwin

Infection Control on Campus

July 15, 2020 Peter Duncanson

Reopening Schools: The Challenge Ahead

Sponsored in Infection Control

ElectroChemically Activated Cleaning and Disinfecting Solutions
April 6, 2017 Sponsored by PathoSans

ElectroChemically Activated Cleaning and Disinfecting Solutions

December 1, 2016 Sponsored by PathoSans

PathoSans® PS30 ElectroChemically Activated Solution System

September 1, 2016 Sponsored by Kutol Products Co.

Multi-color Kids Dispensers and Kid-friendly Soaps

September 1, 2016 Sponsored by PathoSans

PathoSans® PS30 ElectroChemically Activated Solution System

Recent News

ISSA Coronavirus Government Response Update—Stimulus on Hold as Lawmakers Debate SCOTUS Replacement
September 22, 2020 CMM Daily News

ISSA Coronavirus Government Response Update—Stimulus on Hold as Lawmakers Debate SCOTUS Replacement

September 22, 2020 CMM Daily News

Housekeepers Still Bearing the Brunt of Pandemic Unemployment

September 22, 2020 CMM Daily News

Antiquated Cleaning Method Kills Hundreds

September 21, 2020 CMM Daily News

Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Set to Begin for California Cleaners

Perfecting the Electrostatic Cleaning Process
Share Article
Subscribe to CMM