Least Harmful Cleaning

It's about time we not only reduce harm, but eliminate it altogether.

It is time to move from the idea of reduced harm to the very least harmful strategy for cleaning our buildings.

The 1992 Presidential Executive Order 13101 mandates “the use of products and services that reduce the health and environmental impacts compared to similar products and services used for the same purpose.”

I’m suggesting the verbiage be changed from “reduce” to “eliminate.”

It’s time to move beyond trying to reduce the harm done by the way we clean our buildings and advance toward eliminating the harm we are doing.

It’s time to stop being satisfied with doing less harm and adopt a chemical-free model based on a least harmful specification.

The best way to explain this construct is to use a pyramid metaphor to describe the importance of each integrated product choice and examine how they can connect in a comprehensive and integrated system of effective cleaning using traditional, green, natural and chemical-free alternatives.

At its least harmful level, chemical-free cleaning is emerging as the go-to choice for implementing the latest ideas for effective cleaning systems.

Yet, as a practical matter — while chemical-free cleaning may be ideal — it’s not easily implementable in today’s world.

The reality is that effective cleaning will require a mix of products, equipment and materials that are not likely to be wholly chemical-free.

The movement from today’s cleaning systems to a chemical-free model will probably evolve in a series of small steps as the entire industry begins to adjust.

Even as science is helping us move beyond traditional chemicals toward green, less toxic products, it is not likely that the cleaning industry will replace its capital equipment, practices and materials overnight.

Like the movement from traditional chemicals to green chemicals, it will take time to achieve a tipping point for chemical-free cleaning.

So, traditional, green and natural cleaning products should absolutely continue to be included as part of today’s cleaning strategy.

I don’t see how we could otherwise operate in today’s business culture.

What is a concern is the balance of risk that comes with the hierarchy of toxicity inherent on the chemical mix adopted.

With the introduction of chemical-free cleaning strategies and technologies, we can take a step closer to improving health, safety, the ecosystem and our budgets.

A Least Harmful Pyramid

We can now integrate all product alternatives in a cleaning strategy through a four-step pyramid of most safe to least safe cleaning products, equipment and materials.

At the best level of protection, there are effective chemical-free cleaning products available that offer extraordinary value and personal and environmental benefits.

Where no effective chemical-free cleaning alternative is available, natural or enzyme-based alternatives are preferred.

Where no effective natural or enzymatic alternatives are available, certified green chemical alternatives are the next lest harmful strategy.

Where no effective green cleaning chemical alternatives are available, traditional alternatives remain.

Within this mix, a highly effective system of least harmful cleaning can be designed.

Although many have adopted one or more chemical-free alternatives, few have embraced the full range of available alternatives.

This is, in part, because many do not yet understand the range of chemical-free products, materials and equipment available.

If your organization does not require or deliver a comprehensive cleaning program drawn from the ideas suggested by the pyramid, it is not a least harmful program.

Even a wholly green cleaning program — which is vastly more preferable than cleaning with potentially toxic chemicals — does not qualify in its ability to be a least harmful cleaning system.

Posted On September 13, 2012

Vince Elliot

Founder, President and CEO of Elliott Affiliates Ltd.

Vincent F. Elliott is the founder, president and chief executive officer (CEO) of Elliott Affiliates Ltd. of Hunt Valley, Maryland, He is widely recognized as the leading authority in the design and utilization of best practice, performance-driven techniques for janitorial outsourcing and ongoing management.

Topics Tags

Also in Health and Safety

united, cleaning industry
March 30, 2020 Jeff Cross

An Industry Unites: Pulling Together Through Strategic Planning for the Future

March 23, 2020 Julie Howard

After COVID-19: Long-Term Investments Facility Managers Can Make for Health and Hygiene

March 17, 2020 Matt Morrison

How to Stop Custodian-Induced Cross Contamination

March 9, 2020 Michael J. Cantu

How to Prevent Unintentional Needlesticks in Health Care Environments

Sponsored in Health and Safety

January 28, 2020 Sponsored by Chloride-Free Entry

The Winner of the ISSA Innovation of the Year Award is….Entry®

February 6, 2019 Sponsored by ProTeam

High Dusting Kits from ProTeam

July 12, 2018 Sponsored by Sanitaire

Improve Indoor Air Quality in Schools with Better Vacuuming

April 25, 2018 Sponsored by ProTeam

Four New High Dusting Kits from ProTeam

Recent News

Coronavirus Government Response Update—House Passes $2 Trillion Coronavirus Bill
March 30, 2020 CMM Daily News

Coronavirus Government Response Update—House Passes $2 Trillion Coronavirus Bill

March 30, 2020 CMM Daily News

CMI Announces New Associate Partners

March 30, 2020 CMM Daily News

How EVS Staff Are Battling the Coronavirus in Health Care and Hospitality Settings

March 30, 2020 CMM Daily News

Americans Not Disinfecting Properly Amid Pandemic

Least Harmful Cleaning
Share Article
Subscribe to CMM